To provide a structured, resolution-oriented methodology for analyzing
high-risk conflicts and identifying de-escalation pathways. This framework
ensures each briefing remains operational, practical, and focused on
preventing escalation into broader war.
1. Problem Definition
Conflicts ignite and escalate because of identifiable conditions. This step categorizes:
Ignition Risk – the immediate condition that could spark escalation.
Accelerant – developments that heighten tensions (e.g., new weapons, alliances).
Blockade – entrenched obstacles to dialogue (e.g., sovereignty disputes).
2. Center of Gravity
Pinpoints the true vulnerability — often a missing mechanism or weak channel —
that transforms minor incidents into crises. Stabilizing this “hotwire” is
essential to de-escalation.
3. Resolution Levers
Practical, face-saving mechanisms that bypass political deadlocks. These include:
Third-Party Umbrellas – neutral or regional conveners to diffuse political pressure.
4. Sequenced Roadmap
Resolution requires phased, measurable timelines:
90 Days – immediate technical risk-reduction measures.
6 Months – structured dialogues and confidence-building protocols.
12 Months – institutionalized channels with international reinforcement.
5. Narrative Frames
Each side requires a face-saving storyline. Narratives are crafted to maintain
domestic legitimacy while supporting de-escalation:
Side A – sovereignty, strength, or stability preserved.
Side B – safety, livelihoods, or status quo protected.
International Community – stability, supply chain continuity, global peace.
6. Conclusion and Next Steps
Summarizes plausibility, survivability, and operational testability of the
resolution pathway. Defines actionable next steps for direct actors, neutral
facilitators, and international partners.